tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-96848182011-04-21T21:50:38.455ZAbout NASA by people INSIDE NASA!Inside NASAnoreply@blogger.comBlogger21100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9684818.post-1103739274213975512004-12-22T18:12:00.000Z2004-12-22T18:14:34.213Z<a href="http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/000471.html">http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/000471.html</a> <br /> <br />hmmmm..... I don't know...could it be....just possibly...that John Young is....ummm...RIGHT! <br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9684818-110373927421397551?l=insidenasa.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>Inside NASAnoreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9684818.post-1103434618558106952004-12-19T05:25:00.000Z2004-12-19T17:59:14.500ZOk. Pardon the language. It does. Anyone remember the old RIFWatch days? Or even the early NASAWatch? Back then the editor had an ax to grind and he took no prisoners. <br /> <br />Then came the dark days. What NASAWatch is today. Nothing more than a vehicle for the editor to advertise his self-importance. And he'll go to any lengths to maintain that image. Gotta give O'Keefe credit for realizing how to play this bozo from day one. Simply play to his ego and never worry about being blindsided by NASAWatch again. <br /> <br />So here we all are. Needing a vehicle of actual value. Perhaps we can all make it happen here. <br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9684818-110343461855810695?l=insidenasa.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>Inside NASAnoreply@blogger.com2